4.7 Article

Encapsulation-Led Adsorption of Neutral Dyes and Complete Photodegradation of Cationic Dyes and Antipsychotic Drugs by Lanthanide-Based Macrocycles

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 20, 页码 7682-7699

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00688

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board, New Delhi, India [CRG/2021/001700]
  2. CSIR, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the complete photodegradation of neutral dyes and certain antipsychotic drugs using two lanthanide-based macrocycles synthesized with a cobalt-based metalloligand. The photocatalysis process involves the generation of reactive oxygen species and is supported by the band gap of the macrocycles.
Molecular architectures offering large cavities can accommodate guest molecules,while their compositional engineering allows tunability of the band gap to support photocatalysisusing visible light. In this work, two lanthanide (Ln)-based macrocycles, synthesized using a cobalt-based metalloligand and offering large rectangular cavities, exhibited selective adsorption of neutraldyes over both anionic and cationic dyes. Both Ln macrocycles illustrated completephotodegradation of cationic dyes using visible light without the use of any oxidant. Both Lnmacrocycles exhibited complete photodegradation of not only cationic dyes but also a fewphenothiazine-based antipsychotic drugs. Photocatalysis involved the generation of reactive oxygenspecies (ROS), which was corroborated with the band gap of two Ln macrocycles. These resultswere supported by radical scavenger studies and the quantitative estimation of superoxide andhydroxyl radicals. Complete photodegradation of both dyes and drugs was confirmed by spectralstudies, while the generation of CO2and N2gases was established by gas chromatography.Importantly, Ln macrocycles were able to distinguish between the neutral dyes that werequantitatively adsorbed and the cationic dyes/drugs that were completely photodegraded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据