4.7 Article

Characterization of a Hexanuclear Plutonium(IV) Nanostructure in an Acetate Solution via Visible-Near Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy, Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy, and Density Functional Theory

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 4806-4817

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02876

关键词

-

资金

  1. CEA through the chemistry research program (RCHIM) from the cross-cutting basic research program (RTA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new hexanuclear plutonium cluster has been stabilized and its structure studied using vis-NIR absorption spectroscopy, EXAFS spectroscopy, and DFT calculations. The presence of the six-nuclear cluster was confirmed experimentally and computationally, with different EXAFS patterns observed for clusters of different nuclearities and geometries.
A new hexanuclear plutonium cluster has been stabilized in aqueous media with acetate ligands. To probe the formation of such a complex structure, visible-near infrared (vis-NIR) absorption spectroscopy, extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy, and density functional theory(DFT)werecombined.ThepresenceofPu6O4(OH)4(CH3COO)12species in solution was first detected by vis-NIR and EXAFS spectroscopy. To confirm unambiguouslythis structure, EXAFS spectra were simulated fromab initiocalculations. Debye-Waller factors and structural parameters werederived from DFT calculations. A large number of 5f electronswere treated as valence or core electrons using small- and large-core relativistic effective pseudopotentials. It is possible to reproduce accurately the EXAFS spectrum of the octahedral hexamer cluster at both levels of calculations. Further DFT and EXAFS calculations were performed on clusters of lower or higher nuclearities and of different geometries using the 5f-coreapproximation. The result shows that trimer, tetramer, flat hexamer, and even 16-mer clusters exhibit different EXAFS patterns and confirm the very specific octahedral hexa nuclear EXAFS signature

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据