4.6 Article

Diagnosis of HCV infection using attenuated total Reflection-FTIR spectra of Freeze-Dried sera

期刊

INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2021.104019

关键词

Hepatis C Virus; ATR-FTIR; PCA; LDA; Diagnostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research work aimed to assess the potential of ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to distinguish healthy sera samples from HCV infected freeze-dried sera samples and develop a new reagent-free diagnostic tool. The study found clear variations in the ATR-FTIR spectra between the two sample groups, especially in the two specific spectral regions. Multivariate classification algorithms, including PCA and LDA, were used and achieved high accuracy in discriminating HCV and healthy samples.
Globally, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause for liver related morbidity and mortality. Mortality rate linked with HCV can be effectively lowered by prompt and early diagnosis. In this research work, we aimed to evaluate the potential of attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy to discriminate healthy sera samples from HCV infected freeze-dried sera samples in order to develop a new and quick reagent free diagnostic tool. Clear variation was observed between the ATR-FTIR spectra of 87 HCV infected and 83 healthy freeze-dried sera samples. Major variation was observed in the two spectral regions i.e., 3500-2800 and 1800-900 cm(-1). Multivariate classification algorithms including principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used. PCA scatter plot of first two PCs showed 97% variation between the two sample classes. When the four PCs were projected to the LDA algorithm for developing PCA-LDA diagnostic model it discriminated the HCV and healthy classes with 100% accuracy. This study provides an initial insight on the potential to use ATR-FTIR spectroscopy in conjugation with multivariate data classification tools for effective HCV diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据