4.6 Article

Generation of dark solitons in a self-mode-locked Tm-Ho doped fiber laser

期刊

INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2022.104043

关键词

Dark soliton; Optical fiber lasers; Reverse saturable absorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61875043]
  2. HKSAR Research Grants Council, General Research Fund [14203020]
  3. Innovation and Technology Commission, Innovation Technology Fund [ITS/196/19FP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the first experimental demonstration of self-mode-locked dark solitons in a Tm-Ho doped fiber laser at 1.93 μm. The dark solitons are generated by exploiting the reverse saturable excited-state absorption of a gain fiber, achieving higher power and damage threshold compared to conventional methods. Simulation results confirm the generation of stable dark solitons with high average power using this approach.
We present the first experimental demonstration of self-mode-locked dark solitons in a Tm-Ho doped fiber laser at 1.93 mu m with an average power of 149.6 mW and repetition rate of 15.9 MHz. In our system, the dark solitons are generated by self-mode-locking via exploiting the reverse saturable excited-state absorption of a gain fiber, which achieves a higher damage threshold and accordingly laser power over conventional methods based on extra saturable absorber or nonlinear polarization rotation. In the experiments, we study the evolution from high-order to low-order dark solitons by adjusting the pump power, which is attributed to the excited-state absorption in Tm3+ between F-3(4) and H-3(4) energy level. Simulations have been performed to show dark soliton generation by the reverse-saturable absorption mechanism in Tm-Ho doped fiber laser based on the extended nonlinear Schrodinger equation. The results confirm our new approach can generate stable dark solitons of high average power, which may find important applications in laser sensing and laser communications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据