4.7 Review

Data harmonisation for information fusion in digital healthcare: A state-of-the-art systematic review, meta-analysis and future research directions

期刊

INFORMATION FUSION
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 99-122

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.01.001

关键词

Information fusion; data harmonisation; data standardisation; domain adaptation; reproducibility

资金

  1. European Research Council Innovative Medicines Initiative [H2020-JTI-IMI2 101005122]
  2. AI for Health Imaging Award [H2020-SC1-FA-DTS-2019-1 952172]
  3. UK Research and Innovation Future Leaders Fellowship [MR/V023799/1]
  4. British Heart Foundation [TG/18/5/34111, PG/16/78/32402]
  5. SABRE project - Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd
  6. European Union [101016131]
  7. Euskampus Foundation [COnfVID19]
  8. Basque Government (consolidated research group MATHMODE) [IT1294-19]
  9. Basque Government (3KIA project from the ELKARTEK funding program) [KK-2020/00049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study summarizes the computational data harmonisation approaches for multi-modality data in the digital healthcare field, proposes a checklist and flowcharts to guide researchers in reporting their findings, and surveys the limitations of different methods.
Removing the bias and variance of multicentre data has always been a challenge in large scale digital healthcare studies, which requires the ability to integrate clinical features extracted from data acquired by different scanners and protocols to improve stability and robustness. Previous studies have described various computational approaches to fuse single modality multicentre datasets. However, these surveys rarely focused on evaluation metrics and lacked a checklist for computational data harmonisation studies. In this systematic review, we summarise the computational data harmonisation approaches for multi-modality data in the digital healthcare field, including harmonisation strategies and evaluation metrics based on different theories. In addition, a comprehensive checklist that summarises common practices for data harmonisation studies is proposed to guide researchers to report their research findings more effectively. Last but not least, flowcharts presenting possible ways for methodology and metric selection are proposed and the limitations of different methods have been surveyed for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据