4.6 Article

Tularemia research activity: a bibliometric analysis between 1980 and 2020

期刊

INFECTION
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 1507-1515

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-022-01837-4

关键词

Tularemia; Francisella tularensis; Bibliometrics; Publications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed publications on tularemia between 1980 and 2020. The findings showed an increasing trend in research productivity on tularemia, with high-income countries, particularly the USA, contributing significantly.
Introduction Tularemia disease attracts attention as an important contagious zoonosis that has increased its impact in recent years. The aim of the study is to analyze the publications on tularemia between 1980 and 2020. Methods We performed literature retrieval in the Web of Science (WoS) on 22 September 2021. Search terms were Francisella tularensis and Tularemia in the article title for the period between January 1980 and December 2020. We determined the number of articles, keywords, countries, authors, and institutions for each publication. We visualized the data with the VOS viewer tool. Results After all inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied finally, 1688 articles were analyzed. The number of articles has increased in recent years. The three most productive countries in tularemia were the USA (777 articles 46.03%), Sweden (113 articles 6.69%), and Turkey (95 articles, 5.63%). Most of the articles were from the journal of Infection and Immunity (II), Plos one, Journal of Clinical Microbiology (JCM), Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID), and Vaccine. Sjostedt A. and Umea University-Sweden were the most influential author and institution. Conclusions Productivity trend has been shown to increase in tularemia. High-income countries had a great influence on the literature in the field. Publications from the USA were in a high percentage among all articles. Related work may lead to the future direction of this dossier in the next years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据