4.6 Review

Differential efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapies for the management of COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

期刊

INFECTION
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 21-35

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-022-01825-8

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; Antibody; Convalescent plasma; Monoclonal antibody; Network meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed and compared the efficacy and safety of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody regimens for COVID-19 through a systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that certain antibody regimens can significantly reduce mortality and hospitalization rates, but convalescent plasma and anti-COVID IVIg were not effective and may increase the odds of adverse events. Future research should further examine the impact of baseline seronegativity, disease severity, patient risk factors, and viral strain variation on the efficacy of these regimens.
Purpose To assess and compare the relative efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody regimens for COVID-19. Methods This systematic review and random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA-NMA. Literature searches were conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CNKI up to February 20th, 2022. Interventions were ranked using P scores. Results Fifty-five RCTs (N = 45,005) were included in the review. Bamlanivimab + etesevimab (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.77) was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared to standard of care/placebo. Casirivimab + imdevimab reduced mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91) in baseline seronegative patients only. Four different regimens led to a significant decrease in the incidence of hospitalization compared to standard of care/placebo with sotrovimab ranking first in terms of efficacy (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.48). No treatment improved incidence of mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital/ICU stay, and time to viral clearance. Convalescent plasma and anti-COVID IVIg both led to a significant increase in adverse events compared to standard of care/placebo, but no treatment increased the odds of serious adverse events. Conclusion Anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs are safe, and could be effective in improving mortality and incidence of hospitalization. Convalescent plasma and anti-COVID IVIg were not efficacious and could increase odds of adverse events. Future trials should further examine the effect of baseline seronegativity, disease severity, patient risk factors, and SARS-CoV-2 strain variation on the efficacy of these regimes. Registration PROSPERO-CRD42021289903.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据