4.5 Article

Novel Gene Variants Associated with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 89, 期 7, 页码 682-691

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-022-04098-z

关键词

Primary ciliary dyskinesia; Targeted next-generation sequencing; Mutation analysis; Ciliary diseases

资金

  1. Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Council [TSA-2018-3522]
  2. TUBITAK 2209/A, Turkey [1919B01100081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to determine the demographic, clinical, and genetic profile of Turkish Caucasian PCD cases. Disease-related variations in eight different genes were found to be associated with the disease, and phenotypic differences were identified even in patients with the same mutation.
Objectives To determine the demographic, clinical, and genetic profile of Turkish Caucasian PCD cases. Methods Targeted next-generation sequencing (t-NGS) of 46 nuclear genes was performed in 21 unrelated PCD cases. Sanger sequencing confirmed of potentially disease-related variations, and genotype-phenotype correlations were evaluated. Results Disease-related variations were identified in eight different genes (CCDC39, CCDC40, CCDC151, DNAAF2, DNAAF4, DNAH11, HYDIN, RSPH4A) in 52.4% (11/21) of the cases. The frequency of variations for CCDC151, DNAH11, and DNAAF2 genes which were highly mutated genes in the cohort was 18% in 11 patients. Each of the remaining gene variations was detected once (9%) in different patients. The variants, p.R482fs*12 in CCDC151, p.E216* in DNAAF2, p.I317* in DNAAF4, p.L318P and p.R1865* in DNAH11, and p.N1505D and p.L1167P in HYDIN gene were identified as novel variations. Interestingly, varying phenotypic findings were identified even in patients with the same mutation, which once again confirmed that PCD has a high phenotypic heterogeneity and shows individual differences. Conclusion This t-NGS panel is potentially helpful for exact and rapid identification of reported/novel PCD-disease-causing variants to establish the molecular diagnosis of ciliary diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据