4.2 Article

Privacy for Healthcare Data Using the Byzantine Consensus Method

期刊

IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2022.2038288

关键词

Health care; bitcoin; blockchain; Byzantine consensus; Fault tolerance

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2021R1A4A1031509]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2020R1I1A3069700]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A4A1031509, 2020R1I1A3069700] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes an optimized Byzantine consensus algorithm for the healthcare scenario, addressing the scalability, arbitrary master node selection, and high network overhead issues in the Healthcare Byzantine consensus method (HBFT). It introduces roles and additional permissions for nodes, reputation-based voting and the FTS algorithm for node selection, and a tree-combined voting algorithm for election security and fairness. The optimized HBFT consensus mechanism reduces network overhead. The suggested POC consensus algorithm has high features dynamics, election security, and minimal overhead compared to HBFT.
The Healthcare Byzantine consensus method (HBFT) has poor scalability, arbitrary master node selection, and high network overhead in the healthcare scenario. This research constructs and proposes an optimized Byzantine consensus algorithm for the alliance chain. First, create roles for nodes in the cluster, provide them additional permissions based on their responsibilities, and build a dynamic network access method for nodes with various permissions. Second, reputation-based voting and FTS are meant for production node selection. The tree-combined voting algorithm assures election security and fairness. Finally, the HBFT consensus mechanism is optimized, reducing network overhead. The suggested POC consensus algorithm has high features dynamics, election security, and minimal overhead when compared to the HBFT algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据