4.5 Article

Microwave-assisted torrefaction and pyrolysis of rice straw pellets for bioenergy

期刊

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
卷 16, 期 14, 页码 2964-2977

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/rpg2.12445

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the use of microwave heating for torrefaction and pyrolysis of rice straw, and evaluates the effects of microwave power and final temperature on product yields and quality. Microwave-assisted torrefaction shows promise for producing high-quality bio-char with high process efficiency and biomass conversion efficiency.
The highlights of this study involve the use of microwave heating for torrefaction and pyrolysis of pelletized rice straw for the generation of high-quality bio-char pellets, and thorough energy assessment of the process. The effects of microwave power and final temperature on the product yields and their quality were thoroughly assessed. At 600 W power, the bio-char yield followed the trend: 33.7 wt.% (800 degrees C) < 35.5 wt.% (600 degrees C) < 55.6 wt.% (300 degrees C). Bio-char yield was unaffected by microwave power at the final temperature of 300 degrees C. High yield of moisture (23.5 wt.%) with a minimal amount of bio-oil (10.5 wt.%) and gases (10.7 wt.%) were obtained at 600 W and 300 degrees C. The major functional groups in the bio-oil were phenols (similar to 40%), cyclic oxygenates (similar to 16%), furan derivatives (similar to 20%) and aliphatic oxygenates (16%). Bio-char obtained from torrefaction at 600 W and 300 degrees C possessed a calorific value of 17.2 MJ/kg with limiting oxygen index of 36.7%, and power generation potential of 4.8 kWh/kg. Overall, microwave-assisted torrefaction is shown to be a promising process intensification strategy to derive high-quality bio-char in a short time of 5-10 min with high process efficiency (51-56%) and comparable biomass conversion efficiency (similar to 83%) with respect to conventional pyrolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据