4.7 Article

A New Method Based on Matrix Completion and Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Predicting Disease-Associated miRNAs

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2020.3027444

关键词

L-2,(1)-norm; matrix completion; miRNA-disease association; non-negative matrix factorization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U19A2064, 61873001, 61872220, 61672037, 61861146002, 61732012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel method based on matrix completion and non-negative matrix factorization (MCNMF) for predicting disease-associated miRNAs. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method.
Numerous studies have shown that microRNAs are associated with the occurrence and development of human diseases. Thus, studying disease-associated miRNAs is significantly valuable to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases. In this paper, we proposed a novel method based on matrix completion and non-negative matrix factorization (MCNMF) for predicting disease-associated miRNAs. Due to the information inadequacy on miRNA similarities and disease similarities, we calculated the latter via two models, and introduced the Gaussian interaction profile kernel similarity. In addition, the matrix completion (MC) was employed to further replenish the miRNA and disease similarities to improve the prediction performance. And to reduce the sparsity of miRNA-disease association matrix, the method of weighted K nearest neighbor (WKNKN) was used, which is a pre-processing step. We also utilized non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) using dual L-2,L-1-norm, graph Laplacian regularization, and Tikhonov regularization to effectively avoid the overfitting during the prediction. Finally, several experiments and a case study were implemented to evaluate the effectiveness and performance of the proposed MCNMF model. The results indicated that our method could reliably and effectively predict disease associated miRNAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据