4.7 Article

A Collaborative V2X Data Correction Method for Road Safety

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 951-962

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TR.2022.3159664

关键词

Vehicle-to-everything; Safety; Road safety; Real-time systems; Urban areas; Training; Sensors; Basic safety message (BSM); data correction; software-defined vehicular network; VANET; vehicle-to-everything (V2X)

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province
  2. Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2020-MS-237]
  3. Digit Fujian Internet-of-Things Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Research Fund (Fujian Normal University) [202001]
  4. Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (Key Projects)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a collaborative vehicle data correction method for correcting V2X data errors to enhance driving safety. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in detecting and correcting erroneous data.
Driving safety is one of the most important points to concern on the road. Vehicles constantly generate messages under vehicle-to-everything (V2X) assisted driving. Especially, in dense urban environments, the massive messages carrying precise data can help us to improve road safety. However, vehicles do not always provide accurate data due to a variety of reasons, such as defective vehicle sensors, or selfish. It is critical to check and analyze the data supplied by vehicles in real time and correct the possible errors to eliminate the unsafe issues. In this article, we introduce a cOllaborative vehiClE dAta correctioN method (OCEAN) based on rationality and $Q$-learning techniques to correct the error V2X data for ensuring the driving safety of vehicles on the road, which can be deployed on both vehicles and road side unit. Extensive experimental results show that OCEAN can detect error V2X data up to 80$\%$ and cut down 60$\%$ average error distance for most attributes in vehicle data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据