Flexible Joint Planning of Sectionalizing Switches and Tie Lines Among Distribution Feeders

This paper proposes an optimization model for the joint planning of sectionalizing switches (SSs), including remote-controlled switches (RCSs) and manual switches (MSs), and tie lines among distribution feeders. Considering a flexible installation of SSs and tie lines (i.e., deployment of SSs on both sides of a line and construction of external and internal tie lines on of a feeder), this model is conducive to developing an economic investment scheme while preserving the expected energy not supplied (EENS) reliability criterion. First, the minimum total cost of investment, maintenance and penalty for EENS is chosen as the objective function. Next, a route analysis method is introduced to analyze particular performances of different deployment schemes for RCSs, MSs, external tie lines and internal tie lines. Considering the differences between overhead lines and underground cables, the lower bound of the restoration time of each load is estimated based on optimal restoration strategies in different fault scenarios. Then, the joint planning problem is formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model with the aid of algebraic operations to calculate the global optimal solution. The effectiveness of the proposed model is verified for several cases in a 54-node distribution system. Numerical results indicate that the proposed planning solution merits higher economy and lower EENS as compared to the schemes offered by other prevalent methods.

Automated summary

This paper proposes an optimization model for the joint planning of sectionalizing switches and tie lines among distribution feeders. The model takes into account flexible installation, maintenance costs, and reliability requirements. A route analysis method is used to analyze different deployment schemes, and a mixed-integer linear programming model is formulated for the joint planning problem. Numerical results show that the proposed planning solution is more cost-effective and has lower outage energy compared to other methods.