4.8 Review

A Comprehensive Review on CubeSat Electrical Power System Architectures

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 3161-3177

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3110002

关键词

CubeSat; Payloads; Low earth orbit satellites; Computer architecture; Space vehicles; Planetary orbits; Energy management; CubeSat; dc-dc converters; electrical power system (EPS); low earth orbit (LEO) satellites; nanosatellites

资金

  1. Advanced Power and Energy Center at Khalifa University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides an extensive review of conventional and emerging EPS architectures of CubeSats, identifying and classifying 17 categories. It presents operational aspects and a qualitative comparison of these architectures. The article serves as a useful reference guide for researchers and developers in the field, and offers potential research topics for further exploration and innovation in CubeSat EPS.
CubeSats have been popular for space research due to lower cost, faster development, and easier deployment. The electrical power system (EPS) is one of the significant subsystems for the CubeSat since it handles power generation, energy storage, and power distribution to all other subsystems. Therefore, the design of EPS becomes crucial for successful CubeSat mission, wherein the first step is the selection of EPS architecture. The main objective of this article is to present an extensive review of all the conventional and emerging EPS architectures of CubeSats. A total of 17 categories of CubeSat EPS architectures have been identified, classified, and the operational aspects of these architectures are presented in addition to a qualitative comparison. This article is expected to provide a useful reference guide for all the researchers and developers working in the area of CubeSats EPS. Also, some of the potential research topics are provided to further exploration and innovation for the CubeSat EPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据