4.8 Article

Submodule Open-Circuit Fault Detection For Modular Multilevel Converters Under Light Load Condition With Rearranged Bleeding Resistor Circuit

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 4600-4613

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3122816

关键词

Capacitors; Voltage measurement; Gold; Fault detection; Switches; Hemorrhaging; Electrical fault detection; Fault detection; light load; modular multilevel converters (MMCs); submodule (SM)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873062]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180395]
  3. Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX21_0096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the fault detection of the modular multilevel converter (MMC) under light load conditions and proposes a fault detection method based on a rearranged bleeding resistor circuit (RBRC). Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Fault detection is one of the important issues for the modular multilevel converter (MMC). However, few have studied the fault detection of MMCs under light load condition, where the faulty submodulesx2019; (SMsx2019;) capacitor voltages and healthy SMsx2019; capacitor voltages are almost close to each other in the faulty arm. This article analyzes the performance in detail of the MMC under switch open-circuit faults (OCFs), where the MMC works under light load conditions. And then, a rearranged bleeding resistor circuit (RBRC) based SM is proposed for fault detection in the MMC under light load conditions which can effectively detect the switch OCF based on the logical output of RBRC and the SM switching function. The proposed method can not only detect the fault in the MMC under light load condition, but can also detect the fault in serval microseconds. A 1.5-kW MMC prototype is built in the laboratory and the experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据