4.5 Article

Beta Radiation Hardness of GYGAG(Ce) Transparent Ceramic Scintillators

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 938-941

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2022.3155965

关键词

Alpha particles; beta particles; garnets; nuclear batteries; radiation hardness; scintillators; thermal annealing; transparent ceramics

资金

  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory through the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC5207NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-824518]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental results show that there was no degradation in light yield in the electron-irradiated samples, measured via beta or gamma excitations. A small increase in optical absorption near the wavelength of emission was observed following the largest dose irradiation.
GYGAG(Ce) transparent ceramic garnet scintillators were irradiated with electrons from 0.5 to 2 MeV with fluences from 10(16) e(-)/cm(2) to 10(19) e(-)/cm(2), corresponding to doses from 0.3 to 310 Gigarad. Absorption spectra were measured before and after irradiations. Light yields from alpha, beta, and gamma excitations were measured before and after irradiation and compared to preirradiation values to gain a deeper understanding of how electron irradiations can affect light yield, as well as defects generated in both the surface and bulk. Within experimental error, no degradation in light yield was observed for the electron-irradiated samples, as measured via beta or gamma excitation, with minimal degradation observed via alpha excitation. A small increase in optical absorption near the wavelength of emission was observed following the largest dose irradiation. These results suggest that GYGAG(Ce) is radiation hard to electron irradiation up to 10(19) e(-)/cm(2) and doses up to 310 Gigarad. This robustness to irradiation indicates that transparent ceramic garnets may prove useful for applications such as scintillation-based nuclear batteries by allowing for higher energy beta emitters, increased power densities, and enabling long service lifetimes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据