4.7 Editorial Material

Author's Reply to MoNuSAC2020: A Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation and Classification Challenge

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 1000-1003

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3157048

关键词

Measurement; Image segmentation; Codes; Computer bugs; Biomedical imaging; Nucleus segmentation; MoNuSAC; computational pathology; challenges

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This passage mentions the release of MoNuSAC2020 as a large-scale medical image segmentation dataset and the organization of a corresponding challenge. The authors found minor errors in their code and result tables and responded to them with an errata. Additionally, based on the analysis by Foucart et al., the authors mention some suggestions that are worth considering but may not be immediately implemented.
We had released MoNuSAC2020 as one of the largest publicly available, manually annotated, curated, multi-class, and multi-instance medical image segmentation datasets. Based on this dataset, we had organized a challenge at the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2020. Along with the challenge participants, we had published an article summarizing the results and findings of the challenge (Verma et al., 2021). Foucart et al. (2022) in their Analysis of the MoNuSAC 2020 challenge evaluation and results: metric implementation errors have pointed ways in which the computation of the segmentation performance metric for the challenge can be corrected or improved. After a careful examination of their analysis, we have found a small bug in our code and an erroneous column-header swap in one of our result tables. Here, we present our response to their analysis, and issue an errata. After fixing the bug the challenge rankings remain largely unaffected. On the other hand, two of Foucart et al.'s other suggestions are good for future consideration, but it is not clear that those should be immediately implemented. We thank Foucart et al. for their detailed analysis to help us fix the two errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据