4.8 Article

A Novel RL-Assisted Deep Learning Framework for Task-Informative Signals Selection and Classification for Spontaneous BCIs

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 1873-1882

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.3044310

关键词

Electroencephalography; Task analysis; Feature extraction; Brain modeling; Training; Frequency modulation; Informatics; Brain-computer interface (BCI); deep learning; electroencephalogram (EEG); motor imagery; reinforcement learning (RL); subject independent

资金

  1. Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) - Korea government [2017-0-00451, 2019-0-00079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a novel reinforcement-learning mechanism is proposed to select task-relevant temporal signal segments from a single EEG trial, combined with existing deep-learning-based methods. With experiments and validation, the proposed method showed significant improvements in intention identification performance.
In this article, we formulate the problem of estimating and selecting task-relevant temporal signal segments from a single electroencephalogram (EEG) trial in the form of a Markov decision process and propose a novel reinforcement-learning mechanism that can be combined with the existing deep-learning-based brain-computer interface methods. To be specific, we devise an actor-critic network such that an agent can determine which timepoints need to be used (informative) or discarded (uninformative) in composing the intention-related features in a given trial, and thus enhancing the intention identification performance. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conduct experiments with a publicly available big motor imagery (MI) dataset and apply our novel mechanism to various recent deep-learning architectures designed for MI classification. Based on the exhaustive experiments, we observe that our proposed method helped achieve statistically significant improvements in performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据