4.8 Article

OPAT: Optimized Allocation of Time-Dependent Tasks for Mobile Crowdsensing

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 2476-2485

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3094527

关键词

Task analysis; Sensors; Resource management; Crowdsensing; Monitoring; Mobile handsets; Informatics; Mobile crowdsensing; task allocation; time budget; time dependent

资金

  1. NSFC [61772551, 62111530052, U20A20182, 61872274]
  2. Major Scientific and Technological Projects of CNPC [ZD2019-183-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobile crowdsensing is an emerging paradigm that utilizes smart terminals equipped with sensors to collect sensory data. Efficient task allocation is crucial as the sensing scale increases. This article focuses on the time dependent task allocation problem in crowdsensing systems and proposes an optimized allocation scheme to maximize sensing capacity.
Mobile crowdsensing (MCS) is an emerging paradigm that leverages pervasive smart terminals equipped with various embedded sensors to collect sensory data for wide applications. As the sensing scale increases in MCS, the design of efficient task allocation becomes crucial. However, many prior task allocation schemes, which ignore the time for task-performing, are not applicable to the scenario where mobile users with limited time budgets are able to undertake multiple sensing tasks. In this article, we focus on the task allocation in time dependent crowdsensing systems and formulate the time dependent task allocation problem, in which both the sensing duration and the user's sensing capacity are considered. We prove that the task allocation problem is NP-hard and propose an efficient task allocation algorithm called optimized allocation scheme of time-dependent tasks (OPAT), which can maximize the sensing capacity of each mobile user. The extensive simulations are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed OPAT scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据