4.8 Article

Adaptive Control Design for Underactuated Cranes With Guaranteed Transient Performance: Theoretical Design and Experimental Verification

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 2822-2832

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3065835

关键词

Cranes; Transient analysis; Adaptive control; Backstepping; Friction; Control design; Poles and towers; Adaptive control; robust control; transient performance; underactuated cranes

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFB1312002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62022008, 61973017, 61673035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the adaptive antiswing control for underactuated gantry cranes with guaranteed transient performance under unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances. A set of filters are proposed to make the backstepping technique applicable for the control of crane systems. Through variable transformation, the position error and swing angel could be guaranteed converging to the origin with a given exponential speed.
For antiswing control of underactuated cranes, how to guarantee the converging speed of cranes through control design is essential but still remains unsolved. In this article, the adaptive antiswing control for underactuated gantry cranes with guaranteed transient performance under unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances is investigated. To sovle this problem, a set of filters are proposed to make the backstepping technique applicable for the control of crane systems. Then through variable transformation the position error and swing angel could be guaranteed converging to the origin with a given exponential speed. Hardware experiments are conducted to show that the proposed scheme achieves better control performance over existing methods, and it is illustrated that the proposed control scheme possesses strong robustness to unmodeled uncertainties and external disturbances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据