4.6 Article

Conditional Privacy-Preserving Authentication Protocol With Dynamic Membership Updating for VANETs

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TDSC.2020.3047872

关键词

Authentication; Protocols; Cathode ray tubes; Security; Privacy; Vehicular ad hoc networks; Registers; Vehicular Ad hoc networks (VANETs); authentication; chinese remainder theorem (CRT); conditional privacy-preserving

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [U1936101]
  2. 13th Five-Year Plan of National Cryptography Development Fund for Cryptographic Theory of China [MMJJ20170204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a novel conditional privacy-preserving authentication protocol for VANETs based on the Chinese remainder theorem (CRT). It addresses the challenges of dynamically updating membership and preserving user privacy, while providing message authentication, anonymity, and forward and backward security.
Existing conditional anonymous authentication protocols to secure the group communication in VANETs (Vehicular Ad hoc Networks) render challenges such as dynamically updating membership in a domain and achieving vehicle user's privacy preservation. This article elegantly addresses these challenges by proposing a novel conditional privacy-preserving authentication with dynamic membership for VANETs depending on chinese remainder theorem (CRT). Specifically, the CRT is utilized by a trusted authority to securely disseminate a domain key for the authorized vehicles in the same domain, where each vehicle in this domain is able to obtain the domain key by only performing one modulo division operation in case of domain key updating. Distinct from the previous works in this field, our proposed protocol not only achieves message authentication, anonymity and conditional privacy-preserving, but also provides forward security and backward security of vehicles. Theoretical analysis and experiment simulation demonstrate that the proposed protocol is provably secure and highly feasible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据