Sleep Monitoring Using Ear-Centered Setups: Investigating the Influence From Electrode Configurations

Modern sleep monitoring development is shifting towards the use of unobtrusive sensors combined with algorithms for automatic sleep scoring. Many different combinations of wet and dry electrodes, ear-centered, forehead-mounted or headband-inspired designs have been proposed, alongside an ever growing variety of machine learning algorithms for automatic sleep scoring. Objective: Among candidate positions, those in the facial area and around the ears have the benefit of being relatively hairless, and in our view deserve extra attention. In this paper, we seek to determine the limits to sleep monitoring quality within this spatial constraint. Methods: We compare 13 different, realistic sensor setups derived from the same data set and analysed with the same pipeline. Results: All setups which include both a lateral and an EOG derivation show similar, state-of-the-art performance, with average Cohen's kappa values of at least 0.80. Conclusion: If large electrode distances are used, positioning is not critical for achieving large sleep-related signal-to-noise-ratio, and hence accurate sleep scoring. Significance: We argue that with the current competitive performance of automated staging approaches, there is a need for establishing an improved benchmark beyond current single human rater scoring.

Automated summary

Modern sleep monitoring is turning towards the use of unobtrusive sensors and automatic sleep scoring algorithms. Sensor positions in the facial area and around the ears, which are relatively hairless, are gaining extra attention. The study found that large electrode distances render positioning less critical for achieving accurate sleep scoring.