4.7 Article

Delay Range for Consensus Achievable by Proportional and PD Feedback Protocols With Time-Varying Delays

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 3212-3219

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2021.3096899

关键词

Delays; Protocols; Robustness; PD control; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; Topology; Power system dynamics; Maximal delay range; proportional-derivative (PD) protocol; robust consensus; time-varying delay

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61973060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the delay range for robust consensus of unstable first-order agents using proportional and proportional-derivative control protocols subject to time-varying delays. The results show that the agent dynamics and the graph connectivity may limit the range of tolerable delays, and incorporating the delay variation rate in the design of the PD control protocol can expand the range of achievable robust consensus.
This article examines the delay range for robust consensus of unstable first-order agents by using proportional (P) and proportional-derivative (PD) control protocols subject to time-varying delays. The maximal delay range is defined by the delay consensus margin (DCM), which is a robustness measure within which consensus can be achieved robustly despite the presence of uncertain and time-varying delays. We apply an H-infinity-type small-gain analysis to multiagent systems, which results in explicit lower bounds on the DCM for both undirected and directed graphs. The results provide sufficient conditions for robust consensus for all time-varying delays that may vary within the range. It is seen that the agent dynamics and the graph connectivity may fundamentally limit the range of tolerable delays. It is also found that the DCM can be increased beyond that achieved by the P protocol by incorporating the delay variation rate in the design of the PD control protocol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据