4.6 Article

Effective Scaling of Blockchain Beyond Consensus Innovations and Moore's Law: Challenges and Opportunities

期刊

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 1424-1435

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3087798

关键词

Blockchain; Benchmark testing; Throughput; Scalability; Peer-to-peer computing; Technological innovation; Tools; Blockchain; consensus mechanism; Moore’ s law; performance benchmarking; scalability

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61872195, 61872240]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20200038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article evaluates various blockchain proposals over the past decade and finds the potential for consensus-based scaling to be limited. It introduces topology and hardware innovations for scaling blockchain.
As an emerging technology, blockchain has achieved great success in numerous application scenarios, from intelligent healthcare to smart cities. However, a long-standing bottleneck hindering its further development is the massive resource consumption attributed to the distributed storage and consensus mechanisms. This makes blockchain suffer from insufficient performance and poor scalability. In this article, we evaluate numerous representative blockchain proposals in the past decade and demonstrate that the potential of the widely adopted consensus-based scaling is seriously limited, especially in the current era when Moore's law-based hardware evolution is about to end. We achieve this by developing an open-source benchmarking tool, called $\text{Prism}, with which we further investigate the resource-related factors that hinder the current scaling attempts. Furthermore, we discuss various topology and hardware innovations which could help to scale up blockchain. Generally speaking, this article provides blockchain researchers many valuable insights because it explores the next-generation scaling strategies by conducting a large-scale benchmarking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据