4.7 Article

A Smart Walking Stick for Gait Analysis of Elderly and People With Disabilities

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 9035-9045

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3161992

关键词

Sensors; Legged locomotion; Older adults; Inertial sensors; Transportation; Logistics; Intelligent sensors; Smart walking stick; gait analysis; attitude sensor; attitude algorithm; optimal state estimate

资金

  1. China Disabled Person's Federation Project [CJFJRRB01-2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a smart walking stick (SWS) system was developed to analyze the gait of elderly, disabled, and other relevant users. The system utilized attitude sensors and filtering algorithms to obtain information about the user's gait, including step count, stride length, and step speed. The experimental results demonstrated high accuracy of the system.
Human gait analysis is of considerable significance in the assessment of a user's movement status, abnormality warning and rehabilitation training. In this study, a smart walking stick (SWS) system is developed based on a single 9-axis attitude sensor for gait analysis of the elderly, people with disabilities, and other relevant users. The attitude of the SWS is solved by constructing an error vector of gravitational acceleration as an input to the angular velocity PID algorithm correction. An extended Kalman filter algorithm is used to make an optimal state estimate of the Euler angle. On the basis of such means, a threshold-based approach is adopted to binarize the angle of the SWS and divide the gait cycle, so as to combine the acceleration of the user's movement and obtain information about the user's gait, including the number of steps, stride duration, step length and step speed. The experimental results reveal that the accuracy of the number of steps can reach 100%, and the average error of stride duration, step length and step speed are 0.01 +/- 0.07s, -0.72 +/- 5.22cm and 0.75 +/- 3.74cm/s, respectively, with an average accuracy of 96.43%, 95.20% and 94.45%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据