4.6 Article

Wideband Isotropic Antenna With Miniaturized Ground for Enhanced 3 dB Coverage Ratio

期刊

IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1253-1257

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LAWP.2022.3163174

关键词

Antenna measurements; Bandwidth; Antenna radiation patterns; Antennas; Gain; Three-dimensional displays; Capacitors; Antenna radiation patterns; isotropic antennas; sequential-phase feeding network; wideband antennas

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62022045]
  2. Beijing Nova Program of Science and Technology [Z191100001119082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a wideband three-dimensional isotropic antenna with improved 3 dB coverage ratio. By investigating the impact of metallic ground size on isotropic radiation, a compact sequential-phase feeding network made of lumped components with miniaturized ground is elaborately designed to achieve wide operating bandwidth and enhanced 3 dB coverage ratio in 3-D space. The measurement results demonstrate that the proposed antenna provides a 6 dB gain variation fractional bandwidth of 4% and a 3 dB coverage ratio of more than 80%, indicating promising potential for wideband isotropic radiation applications.
In this letter, a wideband three-dimensional (3-D) isotropic antenna is proposed with improved 3 dB coverage ratio. Based on the investigation about the effect of the metallic ground size on isotropic radiation, a compact sequential-phase feeding network made of lumped components with miniaturized ground is elaborately designed for wide operating bandwidth and enhanced 3 dB coverage ratio in 3-D space. In the measurement, the antenna prototype is with the size of 70 x 70 x 0.5 mm(3) (0.23 x 0.23 x 0.0017 lambda(3)(0)). The measured result shows that the proposed antenna provides the 6 dB gain variation fractional bandwidth of 4% and the 3 dB coverage ratio of more than 80%, leading to promising usage for wideband isotropic radiation applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据