4.6 Article

Bioerosion features of boring polydorid polychaetes in the North Adriatic Sea

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 849, 期 8, 页码 1969-1980

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-04839-3

关键词

Polydora; Boring worms; Erosion rates; Experimental blocks; Micro-CT; Resin casts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the bioerosion activity in the North Adriatic Sea. Limestone panels were deployed and micro-computed tomography was used to study the erosion. The results show that only two species of the polychaete genus Polydora settled on the experimental substrates, and the erosion rate is low.
Considering the pivotal role played by erosive organisms in the marine habitat and the scanty knowledge of this phenomenon in the Mediterranean Sea, the present study aimed to identify the pioneer excavating organisms occurring in the first stages of bioerosion, providing the first estimation of their rate of erosion along the North Adriatic Sea. Bioerosion activity was investigated by deploying sets of limestone panels for a period of 2 years. Moreover, micro-computed tomography was used for the first time to study polychaete erosion, confirming it is a very useful tool for the description of erosion processes. Blocks were placed in the touristic harbor Marina Dorica (Ancona) in July 2017 and periodically collected, the first time after a 6-month period, then bimonthly. Two species of the polychaete genus Polydora were the only boring organisms that settled on the experimental substrates. Erosion rate was estimated by measuring the holes produced by both worm species, and the eroded volumes obtained by resin casts of the holes. Polydora appeared after 6 months of exposure significantly changing its density rates (holes center dot 100 cm(-2)center dot month(-1)) during the exposure, being comparable with densities reported from tropical areas. The erosion rate on the contrary is lower, reaching values of 0.053 g center dot cm(-2)center dot year(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据