4.6 Article

Geometric morphometrics shows a close relationship between the shape features, position on thalli, and CaCO3 content of segments in Halimeda tuna (Bryopsidales, Ulvophyceae)

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 849, 期 11, 页码 2581-2594

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-04876-y

关键词

Calcifying algae; Geometric morphometrics; Green algae; Halimeda tuna; Phenotypic plasticity; Ulvophyceae

资金

  1. Charles University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the population of Halimeda tuna in four regions on the Adriatic Sea coast, exploring the patterns of segment shape plasticity and its relationship with spatial factors and CaCO3 content using geometric morphometrics. The results showed that segment position on thalli was the main determinant of their shape features, and segment shape could also predict their CaCO3 content.
Calcifying green algae of the genus Halimeda J.V. Lamouroux are typical for the modular thalli composed of serial segments. Their CaCO3 content gradually increases with age due to calcification, the intensity of which is largely linked to photosynthesis. The dynamics of segment phenotypic plasticity at different scales and its relation to CaCO3 content is not well known. We investigated the populations of Halimeda tuna in the upper sublittoral of four regions on the Adriatic Sea coast. Using geometric morphometrics, we explored the patterns of segment shape plasticity, their relationships with the spatial factors and CaCO3 content. The results showed that segment position on thalli was the main determinant of their shape features. This effect was considerably more prominent than the differences among plants, populations, or regions. Likewise, the segment shape proved to be a significant predictor of their CaCO3 content. Segments with inversely conical shapes, typical for the lower parts of branches, contained significantly less CaCO3 than the reniform and oval segments that probably contribute most to the overall carbonate budget of the Mediterranean Halimeda draperies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据