4.5 Review

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) exposure through cooking environment and assessment strategies for human health implications

期刊

HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
卷 28, 期 5-6, 页码 635-663

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2022.2081836

关键词

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); cooking activities; indoor air; human exposure; depositions; dust

资金

  1. CSIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes studies on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from cooking activities worldwide, highlighting gaps and challenges in existing knowledge, and emphasizing the need for standardized methods for future policy development.
The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons' (PAHs) exposure through day to day cooking activities has been a serious concern for human health due to their carcinogenic nature. Given the Covid-19 conditions, where people are spending extended time indoors, the likely exposure to these compounds will increase for the members involved/not involved in cooking. In this context, this review summarizes different studies undertaken worldwide on PAHs from cooking activities, the sources of exposure (fumes/emissions, dust/depositions), effect of scale (households/restaurants/neighborhoods) of cooking, monitoring process, risk assessment (air sampling and urinary metabolites), global distribution pattern. Proportionately higher number of studies was focused on cooking fumes and emissions while very limited studies aimed at kitchen depositions and dust. Most of the studies have not reported the size of particulate matter considered for determining PAHs exposure from cooking fumes and emissions. The evaluation of reported data becomes more complicated due to difference in sampling and expression units, the number and types of PAHs (parent, oxygenated-PAHs, i.e., o-PAHs, nitro-PAHs, i.e., n-PAHs) studied/found, lack of other intrinsic information (site and control parameters), lack of specific regulations etc. Therefore, such studies require method standardization for future policy development. This review also highlights the gaps and challenges in existing knowledge and future prospects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据