4.4 Article

Evaluating implementation strategies to support documentation of veterans' care preferences

期刊

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 734-743

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13958

关键词

advance care planning; implementation science; interrupted time series analysis; nursing homes; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Veteran

资金

  1. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative [QUE 15-288]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the effectiveness of feedback reports and feedback reports + external facilitation on the completion of life-sustaining treatment (LST) note templates and medical orders. By comparing the sole implementation strategy at 12 sites with the robust external facilitation at 5 sites, it was found that external facilitation was associated with a significant improvement in outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of feedback reports and feedback reports + external facilitation on completion of life-sustaining treatment (LST) note the template and durable medical orders. This quality improvement program supported the national roll-out of the Veterans Health Administration (VA) LST Decisions Initiative (LSTDI), which aims to ensure that seriously-ill veterans have care goals and LST decisions elicited and documented. Data Sources Primary data from national databases for VA nursing homes (called Community Living Centers [CLCs]) from 2018 to 2020. Study Design In one project, we distributed monthly feedback reports summarizing LST template completion rates to 12 sites as the sole implementation strategy. In the second involving five sites, we distributed similar feedback reports and provided robust external facilitation, which included coaching, education, and learning collaboratives. For each project, principal component analyses matched intervention to comparison sites, and interrupted time series/segmented regression analyses evaluated the differences in LSTDI template completion rates between intervention and comparison sites. Data Collection Methods Data were extracted from national databases in addition to interviews and surveys in a mixed-methods process evaluation. Principal Findings LSTDI template completion rose from 0% to about 80% throughout the study period in both projects' intervention and comparison CLCs. There were small but statistically significant differences for feedback reports alone (comparison sites performed better, coefficient estimate 3.48, standard error 0.99 for the difference between groups in change in trend) and feedback reports + external facilitation (intervention sites performed better, coefficient estimate -2.38, standard error 0.72). Conclusions Feedback reports + external facilitation was associated with a small but statistically significant improvement in outcomes compared with comparison sites. The large increases in completion rates are likely due to the well-planned national roll-out of the LSTDI. This finding suggests that when dissemination and support for widespread implementation are present and system-mandated, significant enhancements in the adoption of evidence-based practices may require more intensive support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据