4.6 Article

Ice sheet decline and rising atmospheric CO2 control AMOC sensitivity to deglacial meltwater discharge

期刊

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103755

关键词

Deglaciation; Termination 1; AOGCM; GLAC-1D; Last Glacial Maximum; Heinrich Stadial; Bolling/Allerod interstadial; Abrupt climate change; AMOC

资金

  1. Helmholtz Postdoc Program [PD-301]
  2. Helmholtz association
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01LP1504A, 01LP1915A]
  4. Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fur Polar-und Meeresforschung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The last deglaciation was characterized by a sequence of abrupt climate events that are believed to be linked to rapid changes in Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC). Deglacial CO2 rise and ice sheet decline modulate the sensitivity of AMOC to meltwater fluxes.
The last deglaciation was characterized by a sequence of abrupt climate events thought to be linked to rapid changes in Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC). The sequence includes a weakening of the AMOC after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) during Heinrich Stadial 1 (HS1), which ends with an abrupt AMOC amplification at the transition to the Bolling/Allerod (B/A). This transition occurs despite persistent deglacial meltwater fluxes that counteract vigorous North Atlantic deep-water formation. Using the Earth system model COSMOS with a range of deglacial boundary conditions and reconstructed deglacial meltwater fluxes, we show that deglacial CO2 rise and ice sheet decline modulate the sensitivity of the AMOC to these fluxes. While declining ice sheets increase the sensitivity, increasing atmospheric CO2 levels tend to counteract this effect. Therefore, the occurrence of a weaker HS1 AMOC and an abrupt AMOC increase in the presence of meltwater, might be explained by these effects, as an alternative to or in combination with changes in the magnitude or routing of meltwater discharge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据