4.5 Article

Motivators and barriers to social participation in two Chinese long-term care institutions: A focus-group study

期刊

GERIATRIC NURSING
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 90-96

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.01.004

关键词

social participation; long-term care; China; life-course; barrier; motivator; focus group; meaningful ageing; healthy ageing

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201506360099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the motivators and barriers to social participation in institutional settings among older Chinese long-term care residents. Motivators include pursuit of healthy aging and meaningful aging, while barriers arise from life-course experiences, long-term care-related factors, and Chinese policy-related factors. Understanding these motivators and barriers is crucial for promoting healthy aging among institutionalized residents.
This study used focus group interviews with 40 older Chinese long-term care residents to explore their motivators and barriers to social participation in institutional settings informed by their lived experience. Using inductive thematic analysis, we found that motivators include pursuit of healthy ageing (better physical and mental health) and pursuit of meaningful ageing (sense of achievement and being useful, increased connectedness and realization of dreams from earlier life). The reported barriers illuminate structural components such as life-course experiences, long-term care-related barriers and Chinese policy-related barriers. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the multidimensionality of motivators and barriers to social participation. To promote healthy ageing among institutionalized residents, staff and policy makers are recommended to initiate and support meaningful activities for residents. Residents' individual dreams and accumulated life-course disadvantages experienced long before admission to long-term care should also be considered when devising effective interventions to increase residents' level of social participation. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据