4.7 Article

Projected ENSO Teleconnection Changes in CMIP6

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL097511

关键词

ENSO; teleconnection; climate change; projected change

资金

  1. National Center for Atmospheric Research - National Science Foundation [1852977]
  2. Australian Government via the Australian Research Council
  3. National Environmental Science Program
  4. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [JPMXD0717935457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the potential changes in teleconnections of the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) due to future climate change. The majority of regions show an amplification of teleconnections, while some regions display a dampening effect. Furthermore, the magnitude of these teleconnection changes is correlated with the projected warming level.
The El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) has far reaching impacts through atmospheric teleconnections, which make it a prominent driver of global interannual climate variability. As such, whether and how these teleconnections may change due to projected future climate change remains is a topic of high societal relevance. Here, ENSO Surface Temperature (TAS) and Precipitation (PR) teleconnections between the historical and high-emission future simulations are compared in more than 31 models from Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. We find significant future (2081-2100) TAS and PR teleconnection changes over approximately 50% of teleconnected regions in December-February relative to 1950-2014. The large majority of these significant teleconnection changes suggest that an amplification of the historical teleconnections will occur, however, some regions also display a significant teleconnection dampening. Further to this, in many regions these ENSO teleconnection changes scale with the projected warming level, with higher warming leading to larger teleconnection changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据