4.7 Article

Dynamic Steady State in Coastal Aquifers Is Driven by Multi-Scale Cyclical Processes, Controlled by Aquifer Storativity

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098599

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [OCE184865, OIA1757353]
  2. US Geological Survey (NIWR/USGS) [2018DE01G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coastal aquifers that provide freshwater to a large portion of the global population are facing salinization, and the current estimation methods may not be accurate due to neglecting the impact of cyclical forcings on average salinity distributions. Numerical modeling shows that both high-frequency fluctuations and low-frequency forcing can significantly alter average salinities, and considering these factors is crucial for accurate estimation of coastal aquifer salinities.
Coastal aquifers supply freshwater to nearly half the global population, yet they are threatened by salinization. Salinities are typically estimated assuming steady-state, neglecting the effect of cyclical forcings on average salinity distributions. Here, numerical modeling is used to test this assumption. Multi-scale fluctuations in sea level (SL) are simulated, from tides to glacial cycles. Results show that high-frequency fluctuations alter average salinities compared with the steady-state distribution produced by average SL. Low-frequency forcing generates discrepancies between present-day salinities estimated with and without considering the cyclical forcing due to overshoot effects. This implies that salinities in coastal aquifers may be erroneously estimated when assuming steady-state conditions, since present distributions are likely part of a dynamic steady state that includes forcing on multiple timescales. Further, typically neglected aquifer storage characteristics can strongly control average salinity distributions. This has important implications for managing vulnerable coastal groundwater resources and for calibration of hydrogeological models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据