4.7 Article

Quasi-Antiphase Diel Patterns of Abundance and Cell Size/Biomass of Picophytoplankton in the Oligotrophic Ocean

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL097753

关键词

diel cycle; picophytoplankton; oligotrophic ocean; flow cytometry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42130401, U1805241, 42122044, 41890803]
  2. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) [SMSEGL20SC02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Picophytoplankton, the smallest and most abundant photosynthetic organisms in the ocean, exhibit synchronized diel cycles in cell numbers and cell sizes/biomasses, which are in a quasi-antiphase relationship. The mortality rates indicate significant grazing pressure on Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus throughout the day and night. This study enhances our understanding of autotrophic picoplankton in the oligotrophic ocean.
Picophytoplankton are the smallest, most abundant photosynthetic organisms in the ocean. Knowledge of the diel variability of these tiny microbes has important implications for the structure of microbial food webs and key biogeochemical processes. However, insight into the mechanisms that underlie picophytoplanktonic diel dynamics is limited. By combining a field survey with a published dataset, we found that cell numbers and cell sizes/biomasses of picophytoplankton were tightly synchronized to the day-night cycle, but they were in a quasi-antiphase relationship to each other. This pattern is a confirmation and extension of previous studies. Mortality rates showed that Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus were subject to considerable grazing pressure throughout the day and night. The quasi-antiphase diel cycles in abundance and cell size/biomass are likely determined by the light-dependent diel behavior of cell growth and division and continuous losses to grazing. This work significantly improves our understanding of autotrophic picoplankton in the oligotrophic ocean.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据