4.7 Article

Pre- and Co-Eruptive Analysis of the September 2021 Eruption at Cumbre Vieja Volcano (La Palma, Canary Islands) Through DInSAR Measurements and Analytical Modeling

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL097293

关键词

-

资金

  1. Presidency of the Council of Ministers-Department of Civil Protection, through the IREA-DPC
  2. EU [871121, 824068, 826292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the eruption of the Cumbre Vieja volcano in La Palma, Spain on 19 September 2021. The researchers analyze Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) measurements obtained from Sentinel-1 images. The results highlight the presence of a sill-like source in the pre-eruptive phase and the action of two dikes during the co-eruptive phase, suggesting a process of magma rising through a network of interconnected sills and dikes. The seismicity before and during the eruption is consistent with the findings.
We investigate the 19 September 2021 eruption of the Cumbre Vieja volcano (La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain). In particular, we analyze the Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) measurements obtained by processing Sentinel-1 images acquired from both ascending and descending orbits. First, we show the importance, for oceanic islands like La Palma, of investigating DInSAR products retrieved from time series, instead of single interferograms, to effectively remove possible atmospheric artifacts within the displacement measurements. Subsequently, we invert the retrieved data through analytical modeling. Our results highlight that a sill-like source was active in the pre-eruptive phase (8-16 September), whereas the action of two dikes prevailed during the co-eruptive phase (17-22 September). This evolution suggests a process of magma rising through a network of interconnected sills and dikes. The seismicity, that preceded and accompanied the onset of the eruption, is consistent with our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据