4.7 Article

Ion-Acoustic Waves in a Quasi-Perpendicular Earth's Bow Shock

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098640

关键词

bow shock; electrostatic waves; ion-acoustic waves; instabilities; electron heating

资金

  1. Heliophysics Guest Investigator grant [80NSSC18K0646, 80NSSC21K0730]
  2. National Science Foundation [2026680]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [2026680] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [2026680] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an analysis of electrostatic waves observed near the quasi-perpendicular Earth's bow shock by the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft. The analysis reveals that these electrostatic waves have large amplitudes and can propagate almost perpendicular to the local magnetic field. The results suggest that these waves may strongly affect the dynamics of electrons in collisionless shocks.
We present analysis of electrostatic waves around the ramp of a quasi-perpendicular Earth's bow shock observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft. The electrostatic waves have amplitudes up to 800 mV/m, which is the largest value ever reported in the Earth's bow shock. In contrast to previous studies, the electrostatic waves have large amplitudes of the electrostatic potential, up to 20 V or 20% of local electron temperature. The wavelengths are from 150 m to 3 km, that is from 15 to 300 Debye lengths and typically from 0.4 to 1.5 thermal electron gyroradii. Importantly, these waves can propagate not only quasi-parallel or oblique, but also almost perpendicular to local magnetic field. The electrostatic waves are interpreted in terms of ion-acoustic waves, although the presence of electron cyclotron harmonic waves cannot be entirely ruled out. These results suggest that electrostatic waves may strongly affect the dynamics of electrons in collisionless shocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据