4.7 Article

Transcriptome analysis in the spleen of Northern Snakehead (Channa argus) challenged with Nocardia seriolae

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 114, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110357

关键词

Nocardia seriolae; Northern snakehead; Transcriptome; Immune response; Spleen

资金

  1. Fine Agricultural Breeds Project of Shandong Province [2019LZGC013, 2019LZGC020]
  2. Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province [2021LZGC027, 2021CXGC010806]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted transcriptomic comparison and functional analysis to investigate the immune response of Northern snakehead after N. seriolae infection. The results revealed the expression changes of multiple immune-related genes and signaling pathways during the infection process.
Northern snakehead (Channa argus) is an indigenous fish species and is one of popularly cultured snakeheads in China and other Asian countries. Unfortunately, Nocardia seriolae infections have caused considerable losses in the snakehead aquaculture industry. However, the infectivity and the immune response induced by N. seriolae in snakehead are unclear. In order to better understand the immune response of Northern snakehead in a series of time points after N. seriolae challenge, we conducted the transcriptomic comparison in snakehead spleen at 48, 96, and 144 h after the challenge of N. seriola against their control counterparts. Gene annotation and pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were carried out to understand the functions of the DEGs. Additionally, protein-protein interaction networks were conducted to obtain the interaction relationships of immune-related DEGs. These results revealed the expression changes of multiple DEGs and signaling pathways involved in immunity during N. seriolae infection, which will facilitate our comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms involved in the immune response to bacterial infection in the northern snakehead.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据