4.6 Review

Can polygenic risk scores contribute to cost-effective cancer screening? A systematic review

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Genetics & Heredity

Large uncertainty in individual polygenic risk score estimation impacts PRS-based risk stratification

Yi Ding et al.

Summary: The study shows that Bayesian PRS methods can estimate the individual PRS variance and generate well-calibrated credible intervals through posterior sampling. Analysis of real traits in the UK Biobank demonstrates that large uncertainty in polygenic risk score (PRS) estimates at the individual level impacts the interpretation of subsequent analyses such as PRS-based stratification.

NATURE GENETICS (2022)

Article Urology & Nephrology

The BARCODE1 Pilot: a feasibility study of using germline single nucleotide polymorphisms to target prostate cancer screening

Sarah Benafif et al.

Summary: The study assessed the feasibility and uptake of a community-based prostate cancer screening program based on genetic risk in the UK, showing an overall uptake of 26%. The majority of men with increased genetic risk underwent further screening tests. The larger BARCODE1 study recruiting 5000 men will further explore the role of genetic profiling in population prostate cancer screening.

BJU INTERNATIONAL (2022)

Article Oncology

Combined Associations of a Polygenic Risk Score and Classical Risk Factors With Breast Cancer Risk

Pooja Middha Kapoor et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the joint associations between a new PRS313 and questionnaire-based breast cancer risk factors, revealing that the PRS313 odds ratio did not differ significantly across strata defined by individual risk factors. A multiplicative model assumption was adopted for breast cancer risk, and the variation in absolute lifetime risk of breast cancer associated with classical risk factors was greater for women with higher genetic risk.

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2021)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps

Adebowale Adeyemo et al.

Summary: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) aggregate multiple small effects of alleles in the human genome to estimate an individual's risk of disease or disease-related traits. By addressing key issues, PRSs can be used responsibly to improve human health.

NATURE MEDICINE (2021)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Targeting lung cancer screening to individuals at greatest risk: the role of genetic factors

Mikey B. Lebrett et al.

Summary: Lung cancer is the most common cancer globally, with genetic factors, screening efficacy, and genetic risk factors playing important roles in the occurrence, prediction, and improvement of screening accuracy for LC.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening using the Stockholm3 test

Andreas A. Karlsson et al.

Summary: The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer found that using the Stockholm3 Model (S3M) as a reflex test for PSA >= 1 ng/mL can reduce prostate cancer mortality. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the S3M test is more cost-effective than the PSA test, especially at higher biopsy costs.

PLOS ONE (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Cross-cancer evaluation of polygenic risk scores for 16 cancer types in two large cohorts

Rebecca E. Graff et al.

Summary: This study investigated polygenic risk score (PRS)-specific pleiotropy across 16 cancers in European ancestry individuals, finding positive and inverse cross-cancer associations. The study identified bidirectional relationships between certain cancer types and highlighted the potential for informing risk prediction and precision cancer prevention strategies.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer

Thomas Callender et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the benefits of using MRI in prostate cancer screening, showing that MRI-first screening can reduce overdiagnosis and the number of biopsies, while improving patient survival rates. Conducting MRI screening based on age and risk-stratified strategies is the most cost-effective approach.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Cost effectiveness analysis of a polygenic risk tailored breast cancer screening programme in Singapore

Jerry Zeng Yang Wong et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a breast cancer screening programme incorporating genetic testing using SNPs against the current mammogram-only screening programme. The findings suggest that a polygenic risk-tailored screening programme is more cost-effective, with lower costs and higher QALYs. This indicates that incorporating polygenic risk into breast cancer screening can be cost-effective and beneficial.

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Comparison of Decision Modeling Approaches for Health Technology and Policy Evaluation

John Graves et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the impact of pharmacogenomic testing on guiding drug selection using four different modeling approaches, with Markov models showing favorable mix of accuracy and runtime. Discrete event simulation models performed well in terms of accuracy, reliability, and speed.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The PRISMA statement was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report the purpose, methods, and findings of their reviews. The updated PRISMA 2020 statement includes new reporting guidance, a 27-item checklist, an abstract checklist, and revised flow diagrams for reviews.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Clarifying the Trade-Offs of Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Study

Nathaniel Hendrix et al.

Summary: Cancer risk prediction plays a crucial role in precision early detection by matching screening intensity to risk levels. Utilizing genetic testing for risk assessment, researchers found that risk-stratified screening policies were more cost-effective than universal screening, especially when risk stratification was tailored based on individual risk factors and population heterogeneity.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis

Chloe Thomas et al.

Summary: Population-based screening for colorectal cancer is effective and cost-effective. This study shows that risk-stratification using genetic and phenotypic risk factors could improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programs without requiring additional screening resources.

CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH (2021)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: a 12-month prospective study of patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior

Tatiane Yanes et al.

Summary: The study found that the majority of women chose to receive their breast cancer polygenic risk score, with high-risk individuals reporting more distress and decisional regret. After 12 months, breast screening and risk-reducing strategies were consistent with guidelines, highlighting the importance of addressing emotional responses in genetic counseling models.

GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2021)

Article Oncology

Risk of Breast Cancer Among Carriers of Pathogenic Variants in Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes Varies by Polygenic Risk Score

Chi Gao et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the joint association of pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes and polygenic risk scores with breast cancer in the general population. The findings suggest that polygenic risk scores facilitate personalized breast cancer risk assessment among carriers of pathogenic variants in predisposition genes.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2021)

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Molecular cancer screening: in search of evidence

Sana Raoof et al.

Summary: Cancer screening through germline genetic sequencing and liquid biopsy can help with early cancer detection, but evaluating their impact on reducing cancer mortality will require rethinking the way clinical trials are conducted.

NATURE MEDICINE (2021)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Prostate Cancer Predisposition

Yasin Bhanji et al.

UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2021)

Article Economics

Methodological Note: Reporting Deterministic versus Probabilistic Results of Markov, Partitioned Survival and Other Non-Linear Models

Edward C. F. Wilson

Summary: When making decisions based on decision-model-based health economic evaluations, it is important to focus on expected outputs rather than single 'runs' based on deterministic analysis. The base-case analysis should come from the means of a probabilistic analysis to avoid misleading recommendations.

APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY (2021)

Article Oncology

Will polygenic risk scores for cancer ever be clinically useful?

Amit Sud et al.

NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History

Dayna R. Cenin et al.

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2020)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

The challenge of early detection in cancer

Nora Pashayan et al.

SCIENCE (2020)

Review Genetics & Heredity

Understanding polygenic models, their development and the potential application of polygenic scores in healthcare

Chantal Babb de Villiers et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS (2020)

Review Genetics & Heredity

Polygenic risk scores: from research tools to clinical instruments

Cathryn M. Lewis et al.

GENOME MEDICINE (2020)

Review Biochemical Research Methods

Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses

Shing Wan Choi et al.

NATURE PROTOCOLS (2020)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Polygenic background modifies penetrance of monogenic variants for tier 1 genomic conditions

Akl C. Fahed et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

What Are Polygenic Scores and Why Are They Important?

Leo P. Sugrue et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2019)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes

Nasim Mavaddat et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2019)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer

Jeroen R. Huyghe et al.

NATURE GENETICS (2019)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci

Fredrick R. Schumacher et al.

NATURE GENETICS (2018)

Review Genetics & Heredity

The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores

Ali Torkamani et al.

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS (2018)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Lynch Syndrome-Associated Colorectal Cancer

Frank A. Sinicrope

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)

Article Oncology

Inherited Predisposition to Cancer: Introduction and Overview

Mark Robson et al.

HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies

CF Chiou et al.

MEDICAL CARE (2003)