4.6 Article

Is switchgrass good for carbon savings? Long-term results in marginal land

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 814-823

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12944

关键词

advanced biofuels; bioenergy; bioethanol; greenhouse gas emissions; lignocellulosic feedstock; limited rooting depth; perennial crops; stable isotopes

资金

  1. FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology [GA 289642, GA 727698]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the impact of growing switchgrass on soil carbon storage capacity in marginal land. The results showed that growing switchgrass can increase soil carbon content, with the greatest increase observed in the center of the field.
The cultivation of perennial crops in marginal land as a feedstock for renewable energy or bio-based products constitutes a promising alternative to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions since they can be produced without land competition issues and with potentially significant amounts of belowground C storing. The objective of this study was to assess soil C storage capacity of switchgrass on a marginal land (poor soil with limited rooting depth on a hilly area) through a spatialized analysis derived from several soil samples. A significant increase in SOC was observed after 13 years. In general terms, SOC increased by 12 Mg C ha(-1). The estimated switchgrass-derived C was 12.7 (+/- 5.3) Mg C ha(-1). A significant positive correlation was observed between the C derived from switchgrass and SOC gain. The increased SOC along the field, however, was patchy, with the highest increments registered in the center of the field, while the lowest ones in the top and bottom of the hill. Soil N stocks have also increased along with the soil C storage, although no direct relationship with C derived from switchgrass was observed. Therefore, it could be stated that growing switchgrass in marginal land can be a valuable option to mitigate the risk of agricultural land abandonment while storing a significant amount of soil C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据