4.7 Article

Blockchain-based random auditor committee for integrity verification

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2022.01.019

关键词

Cloud storage; Integrity verification; Random auditor committee; Election algorithm; Blockchain

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation ofChina [62072105, 61872087]
  2. NaturalScience Foundation of Fujian Province, China
  3. Center-initiated Research Project of Zhejiang Lab, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a blockchain-based random auditor committee (BRAC) scheme for integrity verification of outsourced data. The scheme utilizes a verifiable random function to select a third-party auditor committee for contract verification, and improves security through the randomness of leader election.
With the popularity of cloud storage, integrity verification for outsourced data has attracted more and more attention. The majority of existing research works rely on a unique third-party auditor (TPA) or fixed TPAs to audit the integrity of outsourced data, and thus they are vulnerable to DoS and collusion attacks as the TPA is not completely trusted. To conquer this problem, a blockchain-based random auditor committee is proposed to replace the fixed TPAs for the integrity verification (call BRAC scheme for short). The proposed blockchain consensus algorithm utilizes a verifiable random function (VRF) to select the third-party auditor committee (TPAC) which performs contract verification. The leader of TPAs (LTPA) packs the verification proof into a blockchain called verification chain. The main idea is employing the output of a VRF for leader election to make it probabilistic, such that specific nodes cannot be targeted in advance and a certain fraction of the nodes being malicious can be tolerated. We present rigorous security analysis to demonstrate the security of the proposed scheme. Meanwhile, the comprehensive performance evaluation shows that the proposed scheme improves the performance of data integrity verification effectively. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据