4.7 Article

Effect of Si/Al additives on Cl fate during MSWI fly ash thermal treating process

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107230

关键词

MSWI fly ash; Thermal treatment; Chlorine; SiO2; Al2O3

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1810127]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Science [Y201932]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SiO2 and Al2O3 are suitable additives for municipal solid waste incineration fly ash melting. The addition of SiO2 or Al2O3 significantly promotes the release of HCl. SiO2 has an obvious effect on reducing Cl percentage in residues, while Al2O3 is more likely to retain Cl in the residues.
SiO2 and Al2O3 (Si/Al) are proper additives for municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash melting. However, Si/Al additives impact the emission of chlorine (Cl), which is harmful to the ecology and environment. In this study, co-thermal treating experiments of fly ash and SiO2 or Al2O3 were carried out to determine chlorine migration and transformation. Results show that the release of HCl is significantly promoted by the addition of SiO2 or Al2O3. Thermodynamic equilibrium calculation shows that the reaction rate between additives (SiO2 or Al2O3) and CaCl2 is the main factor limiting the release of HCl. Besides, SiO2 has an obvious effect on reducing Cl percentage in residues, as the addition of 30% SiO2 raises the Cl removal rate to 99.72% at 1250 degrees C. Main component in the residuals is Ca-silicate after addition of SiO2. Compared to SiO2, the addition of Al2O3 is more likely to retain Cl in the residues. Al2O3 reacts with fly ash to generate Cl(-)containing minerals, such as Ca-10(SiO4)(3)(SO4)(3)Cl-2 and Ca12Al10.6Si3.4O32Cl5.4, leading to a lower removal rate of Cl. Moreover, Cl combined with Na and K is transformed to secondary fly ash by volatilization and condensation. Our findings may assist in pollutant discharge control in developing a new melting furnace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据