4.7 Article

The energy analysis and performance of heavy-duty diesel engine with n-butanol addition and different coolant temperature

期刊

FUEL
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123323

关键词

Energy analysis; N-butanol blends; Internal combustion engine; Europe VI emission standards; Combustion and emissions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2021JJ30129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the combustion and emission performance of a Euro-VI heavy-duty diesel engine under different coolant temperature and n-butanol addition. The results indicate that coolant temperature has little effect on exhaust energy flow, while increasing n-butanol proportion can enhance coolant energy and reduce energy loss.
Energy flow assessment can grasp the distribution law of each energy balance term of engines and optimize the control parameters and related structures. In this study, the combustion and emission performance of a Euro-VI heavy-duty diesel engine were tested with different coolant temperature and addition of n-butanol. Research results shows that under idle and high-speed conditions, the position of maximum in-cylinder pressure (P-max) moves backward with the increase of load. What's more, and BSFC can only be effectively reduced when the coolant temperature is raised to 100 degrees C. About the exhaust energy flow, it can be concluded that the exhaust energy flow is not very sensitive to the coolant temperature, but the load and speed are. It is worth noting that coolant energy increased significantly as the ratio of butanol increased, and the proportion of the remaining loss is significantly reduced. Overall consideration, higher temperature of coolant has a positive effect on fuel consumption and Soot-NOx trade-off and coolant with a higher boiling point can improve engine performance and reduce energy loss. Moreover, the addition of a high proportion of n-butanol provides more room for energy recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据