4.7 Article

Ozonation of sewage sludge prior to anaerobic digestion led to Methanosaeta dominated biomethanation

期刊

FUEL
卷 313, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122690

关键词

Anaerobic digesters; Biomethanation; Methanosaeta; Ozone pretreatment

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [116Y181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact of different ozone doses on anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge, finding that an ozone dose of 0.06 g O3/g TSS achieved the highest removal efficiencies and methane production. This was correlated with the abundance of acetotrophic Methanosaeta species.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of sewage sludge is commonly employed for sludge stabilization and energy generation at wastewater treatment plants. Of pretreatment techniques used to accelerate rate-limiting hydrolysis step in AD, economically feasible ozonation is prevalent and permits sludge reduction via oxidation. The stability of AD process during ozonation is crucial for successful energy recovery and needs optimal dosage that encourages methanogenic consortium efficient in methane production. This study, therefore, aimed at investigating the impact of 0.03, 0.06 and 0.09 g O3/g TSS ozone doses on the productivity of mesophilic semi-batch lab-scale 5 L AD operated at a hydraulic retention time of 15 d with organic loading rates of 1.45-1.80 g VS/L.d and on its methanogenic consortium. Measurements of biogas, methane and quantification of methanogenic consortium were done by water displacement, gas chromatography, and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, respectively. Although all applied ozone doses improved sludge characteristics, the highest average daily removal efficiencies with 35% COD, 32% TS, 42% VS, 60% TSS and 69% VSS were achieved through ozonation with 0.06 g O3/g TSS ozone dose. The same ozone dose also yielded 48% more methane in the biogas recovered and this biomethanation was correlated to the abundance of acetotrophic Methanosaeta species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据