4.6 Review

Perinatal mental illness and maternal autoimmune disease: A review of current evidence and avenues for future research

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100975

关键词

Mental disorders; Postpartum period; Pregnancy; Autoimmune diseases

资金

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the association between perinatal mental illness and maternal autoimmune disease, highlighting the shared characteristics and bidirectional relationship between the two. Further research is needed to determine the specific diagnosis, severity, and timing of perinatal mental illness and autoimmune disease, as well as the relative importance of perinatal versus non-perinatal mental illness. This research could have significant implications for the prevention, treatment, and follow-up of perinatal mental illness.
This review summarizes evidence on the association between perinatal mental illness and maternal autoimmune disease and identifies avenues for future research. Perinatal mental illness has several characteristics in common with autoimmune disease, including increased incidence in the early postpartum period, recurrence across pregnancies, evidence of elevated immune-mediated cytokines, and familial risk, as well as the general predominance of mental illness in females versus males. Several studies have demonstrated elevated risk of maternal autoimmune disease in women with perinatal mental illness, and of perinatal mental illness in those with autoimmune dysfunction, suggesting a bi-directional relationship. Further research is needed to elucidate the importance of the specific diagnosis, severity, and timing of perinatal mental illness and specific diagnosis of autoimmune disease, as well as the relative importance of perinatal versus non-perinatal mental illness. Such research could have implications for prevention, treatment, and follow-up of perinatal mental illness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据