4.6 Review

How exposure to chronic stress contributes to the development of type 2 diabetes: A complexity science approach

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100972

关键词

Chronic stress; Type 2 diabetes; Causal loop diagram; Complexity science; Feedback loops

资金

  1. ZonMw Open Competition (Dynamic Disease Networks) [09120012010063]
  2. EU Horizon 2020 project [848146]
  3. Alzheimer Nederland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic stress contributes to the onset of type 2 diabetes, but the exact mechanisms are not fully understood. Responses to stress are influenced by various factors and involve a complex network of neurotransmitters and hormones. Stress can also be influenced by behavioral, metabolic, and environmental factors. Therefore, studying the impact of chronic stress on metabolic health is a complex and emergent process.
Chronic stress contributes to the onset of type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet the underlying etiological mechanisms are not fully understood. Responses to stress are influenced by earlier experiences, sex, emotions and cognition, and involve a complex network of neurotransmitters and hormones, that affect multiple biological systems. In addition, the systems activated by stress can be altered by behavioral, metabolic and environmental factors. The impact of stress on metabolic health can thus be considered an emergent process, involving different types of interactions between multiple variables, that are driven by non-linear dynamics at different spatiotemporal scales. To obtain a more comprehensive picture of the links between chronic stress and T2D, we followed a complexity science approach to build a causal loop diagram (CLD) connecting the various mediators and processes involved in stress responses relevant for T2D pathogenesis. This CLD could help develop novel computational models and formulate new hypotheses regarding disease etiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据