4.5 Article

The Influence of the Modulation Index on Frequency-Modulated Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials

期刊

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.859519

关键词

steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP); brain-computer interface (BCI); electroencephalography (EEG); frequency modulation; user experience

资金

  1. Forschungspool of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg [2017-006]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [390895286, EXC 2177/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the influence of different modulation indices on FM-SSVEPs and finds that increasing the modulation index enhances the FM-SSVEP responses but also decreases the user experience.
Based on increased user experience during stimulation, frequency-modulated steady-state visual evoked potentials (FM-SSVEPs) have been suggested as an improved stimulation method for brain-computer interfaces. Adapting such a novel stimulation paradigm requires in-depth analyses of all different stimulation parameters and their influence on brain responses as well as the user experience during the stimulation. In the current manuscript, we assess the influence of different values for the modulation index, which determine the spectral distribution in the stimulation signal on FM-SSVEPs. We visually stimulated 14 participants at different target frequencies with four different values for the modulation index. Our results reveal that changing the modulation index in a way that elevates the stimulation power in the targeted sideband leads to increased FM-SSVEP responses. There is, however, a tradeoff with user experience as increased modulation indices also lead to increased perceived flicker intensity as well as decreased stimulation comfort in our participants. Our results can guide the choice of parameters in future FM-SSVEP implementations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据