4.7 Article

Probiotic-fermented blueberry pomace alleviates obesity and hyperlipidemia in high-fat diet C57BL/6J mice

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111396

关键词

Probiotic-fermented blueberry pomace; Hyperlipidemia; Serum lipid levels; Serum antioxidant status; Hepatic injury

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32172275]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019BC049]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of fermented blueberry pomace on hyperlipidemia in obese mice. The results showed that fermented blueberry pomace significantly reduced weight gain, liver and fat indexes, and hyperlipidemia in the mice. It also improved lipid metabolism and reduced inflammation by upregulating PPAR-alpha and down-regulating SREBP-1 and FAS.
This study investigated the effect of FBP (fermented blueberry pomace by the mixture of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus plantarum-1) on hyperlipidemia in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced C57BL/6J obese mice. The results indicated that FBP significantly reduced the weight gain, liver and fat indexes, and hyperlipidemia of HFD mice. Serum TC, TG, and LDL-C in HFD mice were significantly decreased through supplementation with FBP, and serum SOD, GSH-Px, CAT, and T-AOC in H-FBP group were increased by 28.25%, 26.84%, 23.30%, and 19.79%, respectively. Furthermore, FBP reduced the activity of ALT, AST, and LPS; down-regulated the expression of inflammation-related cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, and IL-6); and improved lipid metabolism by upregulating PPAR-alpha and down-regulating SREBP-1 and FAS. Thus, FBP alleviated obesity, liver injury, and inflammation caused by a HFD by increasing antioxidant capacity and reducing leptin production, indicating that FBP is a nutrient-rich beverage with the potential to relieve obesity. Generally, this study highlightsed a new use of blueberry pomace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据