4.7 Article

Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis in blackberry

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.110948

关键词

Differentially expressed metabolites; Differentially expressed genes; Coexpression network; KEGG metabolism; Fruit; Transcription factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [32101566]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20210165]
  3. Jiangsu Institute of Botany Talent Fund [JIBTF202105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blackberry fruit is rich in anthocyanins, which have nutritional and health benefits. Through transcriptome and metabolome analysis, the molecular mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis were identified.
Blackberry fruit is rich in anthocyanins, showing incomparable nutritional and health value. Anthocyanins are flavonoids that are downstream products of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. They are important secondary metabolites with antioxidant and anticancer functions. Therefore, we performed combined transcriptome and metabolome analyses of unripe and ripe blackberry fruits to identify the molecular mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis. Herein, we identified 997 differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) in positive-ion mode, 411 DEMs in negative-ion mode, and 17,566 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Eight DEMs and 16 DEGs were annotated to the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. Four DEGs related to flavonoids (unigene 0028088, unigene 0039337, unigene 0063209, and unigene 0014842) were positively correlated with related flavonoid DEMs. Interestingly, 8 DEGs and 11 flavonoid-related DEMs showed significant negative correlations. This study lays a foundation for further research on the biosynthesis and metabolism of flavonoid, providing a reference for the future breeding and cultivation of excellent high-flavonoid germplasm resources and the blackberry-related pharmaceutical industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据