4.7 Article

A surface-enhanced Raman scattering aptasensor for ratiometric detection of aflatoxin B1 based on graphene oxide-Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles complex

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108748

关键词

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; Ratiometric aptasensor; Aflatoxin B1; Graphene oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel ratiometric surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) aptasensor based on graphene oxide (GO) was constructed for reliable detection of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). The sensor achieved a low limit of detection (LOD) of 0.1 pg/mL and showed potential application prospects in the food detection field, with a good negative correlation (R2 = 0.992) and a quantifiable test range from 0.0001 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL.
Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) has the strongest carcinogenesis and mutagenesis effects. Herein, a novel ratiometric surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) aptasensor based on graphene oxide (GO) as a corrective internal standard (IS) and signal amplifier was constructed for reliable detection of AFB1. 4-Mercaptobenzoic acid as Raman reporter embedded in Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles and AFB1aptamer conjugated to the Ag shell acted as the signal probes (Au-4MBA@Ag NPs-AFB1apt). AFB1apt was attached to the surface of GO with Raman signals modified Au NPs/Indium tin oxide glass (GO/Au NPs/ITO) via pi-pi stacking interaction, facilitating further amplification of the signal. With an increase of AFB1 concentration (0.0001 ng/mL-100 ng/mL), the probes were released owing to the affinity of aptamers, causing the decreased 4-MBA intensity (I4-MBA) and unchanged GO intensity (IGO). Therefore, the quantitative test was achieved based on the ratiometric value (I4MBA/IGO). A good negative correlation (R2 = 0.992) was achieved and the limit of detection (LOD) was as low as 0.1 pg/mL, proving the proposed sensor can become an efficient analytical tool and shows a bright application prospect in the food detection field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据